For Information:
Joe Conway
Towers Perrin
914-745-4175
joseph.p.conway@towersperrin.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Towers Perrin Analysis of Expected Changes in Pension Accounting Finds Dramatic Impact Likely on Companiesf Financial Statements

Changes Could Erase $180 Billion in Shareholdersf Equity for the Fortune 100

STAMFORD, CT., January 30, 2006 -- Based on an analysis of changes in the accounting rules for pensions and other postretirement benefits expected to be proposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in March, Towers Perrin found that the Fortune 100 companies that sponsor defined benefit plans would have been required to recognize an additional liability of $331 billion on their balance sheets at year-end 2004, instead of the $62 billion that was on the balance sheet at that time.

After tax adjustments (assuming a 35% tax rate), the FASBfs planned changes would have reduced shareholdersf equity by $180 billion for the 78 Fortune 100 companies that sponsor defined benefit plans, representing a 9.3% reduction in their total shareholders' equity.

Many companies that sponsor defined benefit retirement plans have just begun to assess the impact of the two-phase project announced by the FASB last November.  Phase I of the project, which is expected to affect most companies' year-end 2006 financial reporting, focuses on the balance sheet.  Phase II, which will take longer to complete, involves a comprehensive reexamination of all aspects of accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits. Among the most significant changes expected in Phase II is a move toward mark-to-market accounting for retirement plans, with a requirement that a comprehensive income statement more rapidly report the effects of changes in the fair value of plan assets and liabilities from year to year.

The Towers Perrin study not only measured the impact of the changes in balance sheet rules expected to take effect at year-end 2006, it also analyzed how the planned accounting changes might introduce greater volatility in the balance sheet and income statements of retirement plan sponsors. The analysis showed that for the 78 Fortune 100 companies studied:

Each additional 10% return (or loss) on assets as of year-end 2004 would have changed shareholdersf equity by $56 billion for these companies, representing nearly a 3% change in shareholders' equity for the group.

A 10% change in retirement plan obligations as of year-end 2004 (as might occur if discount rates were changed by a half to three-quarters of a percent) would have changed shareholders' equity for these 78 companies by a total of $77 billion, representing 4% of the total shareholdersf equity of the group. 

An additional 10% return (or loss) on assets, if recognized on the income statement, would have changed 2004 pretax income by 19% for the group. 

A 10% change in retirement plan obligations, if recognized on the income statement, would have changed 2004 pretax income by 26% for the group. 

The Towers Perrin analysis found that the impact of the FASB's expected changes in retirement plan accounting will vary widely from company to company. For some companies, the impact will be dramatic. For example, for one out of 10 companies studied, recognizing a 10% increase in retirement plan obligations as cost would have turned 2004 pretax income into a loss.  Similarly, recognizing a 10% reduction in these obligations on the income statement would have more than doubled the companiesf 2004 pretax income. 

Towers Perrin also noted that the FASB will likely give serious consideration to reporting retirement benefit cost by functional component (e.g., operating, financing, investing activities). If the effects of investment return and interest-rate changes are characterized as nonoperating costs, the new rules could reduce the volatility in operating costs associated with retirement plans despite greater volatility in total costs.

"As our analysis shows, these accounting changes are certain to have a dramatic impact on many companiesf financial statements in the years ahead.  Phase I is likely to result in significant reductions in shareholdersf equity and Phase II seems certain to introduce added earnings volatility," said Bill Gulliver, principal and Chief Actuary for Towers Perrinfs HR Services business. "However, it is uncertain exactly how the market will react because most of the information expected to find its way onto the balance sheet is already disclosed in financial statement footnotes. Consequently, many analysts are already using that information to adjust the balance sheet today."

About Towers Perrin

Towers Perrin is a global professional services firm that helps organizations improve their performance through effective people, risk and financial management. Through its HR Services business, Towers Perrin provides global human resource consulting that helps organizations effectively manage their investment in people. Areas of focus include employee benefits, compensation, communication, change management, employee research and the delivery of HR Services. The firmfs other businesses are Reinsurance, which provides reinsurance intermediary services, and Tillinghast, which provides management and actuarial consulting to the financial services industry. Together, these businesses have offices and business partner locations in 25 countries. More information about Towers Perrin HR Services is available at www.towersperrin.com/hrservices.

# # #